I got into an debate with my friend the other day about a topic that I never thought I’d have to discuss — photoshopping your online dating profile picture. The lies your present with a Photoshopped profile photo will too, but the feeling of betrayal might cut even deeper.
She’s a recent adopter of OKCupid, and is what I would consider a power user, actively pursuing suitors, sending messages and going on countless dates, that swing wildly between enthralling and depressing. Think about the tiny ping of disappointment that hits when you meet someone you’ve only conversed with online, and realize that they are shorter than they said in their profile, or when it’s clear that the picture they used is from high school.
To be fair, the amount of Photoshop work that my does to her pictures is nothing serious.
When I looked at her main photo, something did seem a little off, the colors heightened and tweaked, a weird blurring around the edges — but nothing major.
While online daters think their photos are relatively accurate, independent judges rated one third of online dating photos as inaccurate, according to research carried out by Catalina Toma, assistant professor in the Department of Communication Arts at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
For that reason, she recommends posting a variety of recent photos.
(This first sentence says nothing eye-catching about the woman and is very bland, and boring). (still, nothing thought provoking or attractive) I am very spontaneous and I love the outdoors, watching movies, dancing, and traveling. (Finally something somewhat interesting that she says about herself).
For men, professional head shots and photos with facial hair were rated the highest and, for women, photos showing the person singing or playing an instrument, playing a sport or wearing a bikini were rated the highest, according to a survey of 2,000 profiles by The Grade dating app.
amped-up lighting, makeup, and hair) and the other was non-beautified (satisfactory lighting, no makeup, no hair primping).
The study volunteers were then asked questions about the person’s attractiveness, potential trustworthiness, and desirability.
One of the profiles used in the study: The top profile photo is pre-beautification, while the bottom photo is post-beautification. (Photo courtesy of data-reactid="29"One of the profiles used in the study: The top profile photo is pre-beautification, while the bottom photo is post-beautification.
(Photo courtesy of trustworthy." data-reactid="30"The men perceived the lady in the glam shot as being more attractive, yet less trustworthy, than in the non-dolled-up photo.